Why does my wife invest only in a couple of Aggressive Hybrid funds and nothing else?
I, being an enthusiast of mutual funds, tried to introduce
my wife to the world of investments and mutual funds. I used to keep on
watching mutual fund-related videos, hearing audiobooks and reading articles, and books
wherever and whatever my eyes could lay on at times in front of her. I tried to
discuss my new learnings with my wife during long drives or at bedtime but she
used to get irritated by my latest obsession. And, she had a problem too – lack
of disposable money. After leaving her job and choosing to be a full-time
“housewife”, the only money she had is some old savings and the monthly money that
I give her mostly to run the house. The monthly money that she receives is a
paltry sum for many. And she is addicted to Nykaa, Myntra, and the likes. So, I
doubted if she has a “Saving” mentality at all!
However, to my shock, one day she proclaimed that she started two “SIP”s for an unknown goal and for an unspecified time horizon most likely to be long-term. She planned to invest a few lump sums too along the way at opportune moments in the same funds. I was apprehensive about her selection as I thought she must be lured towards funds that gave unreal recent returns. I was pleasantly surprised when I realized that she chose two “Aggressive Hybrid Mutual Funds”.
I couldn’t resist asking her why she chose Aggressive Hybrid among the all categories. She asked me instead, “You tell me what few common traits of a good long-term portfolio are?” I silently started to prepare a checklist for a thought experiment:
a) It should be a diversified portfolio of Stocks and Bonds – it should have multiple asset classes.
b) If the portfolio is long-term, then it should have a large equity allocation as that is historically the most rewarding asset class.
c) The equity part of the portfolio should be broad market-based. There should be stocks from Large, Mid and Small cap companies and various industries and sectors. It should have a Flexi-cap/ Multi-cap structure.
d) The portfolio should not only focus on return rather it should give better “risk-adjusted return”. It should manage the downside well.
e) The debt part of the portfolio should have optimum “Credit Quality” without compromising yield, should not have “Liquidity Risk” and should be somewhat in the middle when it comes to “Interest Rate Risk”.
f) Systematic rebalancing is a must to maintain the risk profile of the portfolio and to optimize the return. Systematic rebalancing entails periodic profit booking when the equity market is high and periodic investment when the market is low.
g) Portfolio must be low effort and cost to maintain.
h) Portfolio should provide an optimum tax-adjusted return as that is the real rate of return.
Overall Portfolio composition:
I remembered something that I read a long time ago – Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT). It was advocated by economist Harry Markowitz in 1950. MPT advocates the diversification of securities and asset classes. It believes in not putting all the eggs in one basket. MPT says stocks may be most rewarding but face both systemic risks - market-related risks such as interest rates and recessions, as well as un-systemic risks—issues that are specific to individual stocks. MPT helps to design an ideal portfolio that will provide the investor with maximum returns by taking on the optimal amount of risk.
Notice that the 100% bond
portfolio and 50% bond-50% stock portfolio have very comparable volatility but
contrary to popular belief, the latter is more rewarding in terms of Returns.
So, according to MPT, a 100% bond portfolio is risky and provides a sub-optimal
return. And 100% stock portfolio may be most rewarding but very volatile. So
they are both non-ideal. An efficient frontier of better risk-adjusted return
lies somewhere between the 40% bond 60% stock, 30% bond 70% stock, or 20% bond
80% stock area. The ideal mix for an individual though depends on the risk
tolerance of the given individual.
Let us look at the asset class mix
of the few aggressive funds of some renowned asset management companies (AMC).
In light of MPT, we notice they are very similar and they all fall in the
Efficient Frontier area. Allocations slightly differ based on their opinion of
the market based on their market research.
|
28-Feb-2023 |
31-May-2023 |
||||
|
ICICI
Pru Equity & Debt Fund(G) |
DSP
Equity & Bond Fund (G) |
Mirae
Asset Hybrid Equity (G) |
ICICI
Pru Equity & Debt Fund(G) |
DSP
Equity & Bond Fund (G) |
Mirae
Asset Hybrid Equity (G) |
Equity
or Equivalent |
75.50% |
73.70% |
73.30% |
71.90% |
74.35% |
70.50% |
Debt or
Equivalent |
22.20% |
25.20% |
23.50% |
19.80% |
24.75% |
25.20% |
Cash
Equivalent |
02.30% |
01.10% |
03.20% |
08.30% |
0.90% |
04.30% |
Let us now update the checklist with what we have seen so far:
SL# |
Items |
Verdict |
a |
Diversified portfolio across multiple asset classes – stocks (equity)
and bonds(debt) |
☑ |
b |
Large equity allocation based on Efficient Frontier |
☑ |
c |
Diversified equity portfolio |
|
d |
Optimum risk-adjusted portfolio return with optimum volatility |
☑ |
e |
Debt portfolio should provide optimal yield by managing the risks -
“Credit Risk”, “Liquidity Risk”, and “Interest Rate Risk” |
|
f |
Periodic rebalancing |
☑ |
g |
Low cost and low effort to maintain |
|
h |
The optimum tax-adjusted real rate of return on the overall portfolio |
|
Now let us dig deep into the Equity portfolio of a few aggressive hybrid funds:
Market cap split (%)
|
Percentage
as part of whole Equity & Debt Portfolio |
Percentage
as part of only Equity Portfolio |
||||
|
ICICI
Pru Equity & Debt Fund(G) |
DSP
Equity & Bond Fund (G) |
Mirae
Asset Hybrid Equity (G) |
ICICI
Pru Equity & Debt Fund(G) |
DSP
Equity & Bond Fund (G) |
Mirae
Asset Hybrid Equity (G) |
Large
Cap |
63.43% |
43.62% |
54.79% |
88.20% |
58.68% |
77.72% |
Mid Cap |
04.71% |
19.11% |
08.18% |
06.55% |
25.70% |
11.60% |
Small
Cap |
03.77% |
11.62% |
07.52% |
05.25% |
15.62% |
10.66% |
Total
Equity |
71.91% |
74.35% |
70.49% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
As on 31-May-2023
Top 10 sector holding (%)
Now I realized that equity parts
of the Aggressive Hybrid funds are diversified across market caps and sectors.
Fun Fact: When inspecting closure, one might find a startling resemblance between Flexi Cap of an AMC and the Aggressive Hybrid’s Equity portion of the respective AMC. Many AMCs have the same Fund Managers too for their Flexi Caps and Aggressive Hybrids (DSP/ Mirae/ Canara Robeco). However, this is not true for all. Say, ICICI’s Equity part of their Aggressive Hybrid looks more like a Large Cap fund.
Let us now update the checklist with what we have seen so far:
SL# |
Items |
Verdict |
a |
Diversified portfolio across multiple asset classes – stocks (equity)
and bonds(debt) |
☑ |
b |
Large equity allocation based on Efficient Frontier |
☑ |
c |
Diversified equity portfolio - across market caps and sectors |
☑ |
d |
Optimum risk-adjusted portfolio return with optimum volatility |
☑ |
e |
Debt portfolio should provide optimal yield by managing the risks -
“Credit Risk”, “Liquidity Risk”, and “Interest Rate Risk” |
|
f |
Systematic rebalancing – periodic profit booking and investment |
☑ |
g |
Low cost and low maintenance |
|
h |
The optimum tax-adjusted real rate of return on the overall portfolio |
|
Debt investment:
Now let us examine the debt parts
of the same three Aggressive Hybrid funds:
As on 31-May-2023
- The debt part of the portfolio should
have a mix of papers in terms of Credit Quality. A large portion should be in the highest quality papers (AAA/AA+) but could also have upper medium grade papers (AA-,
A+, A, A-) in strict moderation for better yield/ return.
- Debt part should also have a substantial
amount of Government Securities (SOV) for Liquidity.
To calibrate the Duration Risk/
Interest Rate Risk, let us look at the below table:
|
ICICI
Pru Equity & Debt Fund(G) |
DSP
Equity & Bond Fund (G) |
Mirae
Asset Hybrid Equity (G) |
Average
Maturity |
6.49
Years |
2.62
Years |
4.14
Years |
Modified
Duration |
1.20
Years |
2.22
Years |
3.06
Years |
Yield
to Maturity |
7.73% |
7.38% |
7.52% |
As on 31-May-2023
- Debt part also should be
somewhat in the middle when it comes to Interest Rate Risk. Liquid, ultra-short-term bonds carry low-interest rate risk but provide sub-par yield. Long-term
papers give better yields but punishing during the rising interest regime. The debt part
of the entire portfolio needs to be in the middle which will give an all-season
bond flavour.
Here, Yield to Maturity is around
7.50% on average with middle-of-the-road - 2%-3% interest rate sensitivity. I
can’t complain about such compositions.
Fun Fact: I realized that debt
parts of the Aggressive Hybrid funds of any AMC have an uncanny resemblance with
Short Duration Debt Fund or Medium Duration Debt Fund of the respective AMC.
Let us now update the checklist with
what we have seen so far:
SL# |
Items |
Verdict |
a |
Diversified portfolio across multiple asset classes – stocks (equity)
and bonds(debt) |
☑ |
b |
Large equity allocation based on Efficient Frontier |
☑ |
c |
Diversified equity portfolio - across market caps and sectors |
☑ |
d |
Optimum risk-adjusted portfolio return with optimum volatility |
☑ |
e |
Debt portfolio should provide optimal yield by managing the risks -
“Credit Risk”, “Liquidity Risk”, and “Interest Rate Risk” |
☑ |
f |
Systematic rebalancing – periodic profit booking and investment |
☑ |
g |
Low cost and low maintenance |
|
h |
Optimum tax-adjusted real rate of return on the overall portfolio |
|
Cost and Maintenance:
Aggressive Hybrid funds
automatically rebalance so they effectively require zero maintenance. Good
aggressive hybrid funds are available in expense ratios between 0.50%-1.0% in
direct plans. In India, even Nifty index funds cost between 0.20%-0.40% so the
pricing of Aggressive Hybrids is super competitive. They are more attractive
because of taxation though.
Tax-adjusted return:
Now, debt funds attract tax rates as
per slab rate (as high as 30% for most) from 01-Apr-2023. Before that only if
held for more than 3 years it used to get 20% taxation with indexation benefit.
But now that is history.
Whereas Aggressive Hybrids get
favourable tax treatment i.e. once held more than 1 year, taxation will be
10% else if held less than a year,
taxation will be at 15%. That is de facto equity taxation on the bond component
which is a huge benefit. Penny saved is a penny earned. So, the real return on
the portfolio will be boosted.
Let us now update the checklist for
the final time:
SL# |
Items |
Verdict |
a |
Diversified portfolio across multiple asset classes – stocks (equity)
and bonds(debt) |
☑ |
b |
Large equity allocation based on Efficient Frontier |
☑ |
c |
Diversified equity portfolio - across market caps and sectors |
☑ |
d |
Optimum risk-adjusted portfolio return with optimum volatility |
☑ |
e |
Debt portfolio should provide optimal yield by managing the risks -
“Credit Risk”, “Liquidity Risk”, and “Interest Rate Risk” |
☑ |
f |
Systematic rebalancing – periodic profit booking and investment |
☑ |
g |
Low cost and low maintenance |
☑ |
h |
The optimum tax-adjusted real rate of return on the overall portfolio |
☑ |
###############
I came back from my thought mode,
and asked “What about Commodity allocation?” My wife casually replied: “I have
enough gold ornaments”. I asked “What
about international allocation?” “What about index funds?” She nonchalantly
replied, “Enough of your whataboutery, one cannot get every investment idea
implemented in one’s portfolio”. She continued, “I can also ask what about
favourable tax treatment on the entire portfolio”. I am speechless now. My
whole life was a lie. I hid my face in the newspaper and concentrated on the
hot tea instead.
###############
Value Research Success Story: Bahubali Investor
0 comments:
Post a Comment